PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
74.01%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -82.82%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
20.25%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -8.16%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
190.60%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -107.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
22.70%
Less SBC growth vs. SONY's 57.81%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
283.07%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -177.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
74.24%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -127.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-434.33%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -222.18%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
15.69%
Lower AP growth vs. SONY's 294.22%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
2387.27%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -195.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.81%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -150.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
11.36%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SONY's 30.23%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-890.57%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-87.53%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 18.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
24.72%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -6.34%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-82.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -56.63%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-2571.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -364.70%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.28%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-2.42%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.