PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.28%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -389.20%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.18%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 52.98%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-173.70%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 284.26%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.25%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -1.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
327.27%
Well above SONY's 110.16% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-502.21%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 215.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-204.68%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -39.51%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
5528.85%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -5497.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
430.00%
Growth well above SONY's 604.31%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.21%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONY's 60.97%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-58.45%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 11.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-745.72%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
19.68%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -15.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
30.19%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -25.53%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-70.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -149.29%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
113.49%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -28.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
213.83%
Issuance growth of 213.83% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-240.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.