PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-42.73%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONY at -51.13%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-16.15%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 1.31%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-5.78%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-2.78%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-222.86%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 58.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-83.52%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 73.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
266.67%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -88.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-901.88%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONY at -1.21%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
955.17%
Growth well above SONY's 82.84%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
80.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SONY's 179.28%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-57.76%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 216.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
35.12%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -10.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
37.21%
Some acquisitions while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
19.92%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -22.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-13.70%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -13.40%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
86.05%
Growth well above SONY's 77.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
33.20%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -65.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24500.00%
Issuance growth of 24500.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
2.86%
Buyback growth of 2.86% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.