229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.62%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -154.59%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.87%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 27.65%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-112.05%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-2.28%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
228.29%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 1214.49%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-4852.94%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 248.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-166.89%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -83.62%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
6475.98%
AP growth well above SONY's 23.69%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
70.30%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONY's 1468.06%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while SONY is 603.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
51.65%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 44.47%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-39.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -31.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-2416.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-12.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -13.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
5.11%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -40.99%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
268.80%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -485.18%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-65.48%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -69.51%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-190.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -303.11%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.72%
Buyback growth of 40.72% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.