PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
87.28%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SONY's 111.04%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
10.51%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -6.81%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-2906.74%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
10.39%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
35687.74%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -160.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1.75%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -120.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
125.39%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -379.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-15.02%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 250.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
373.56%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -165.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
54.17%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -1152.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
80.72%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -89.70%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
29.75%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 22.43%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-113.58%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-14.99%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 12.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.00%
Below 50% of SONY's 22.42%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
53.76%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -11.37%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-36.69%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 29.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-0.46%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONY is 94.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-29.51%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.