PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-16.66%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 120.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.70%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 12.10%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
326.10%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -659.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
0.22%
SBC growth of 0.22% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
10.60%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 91.56%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-97.44%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -124.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
152.24%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 197.04%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
106.48%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -224.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-166.86%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 145.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-85.00%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -461.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-4.24%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 83.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
22.12%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 19.11%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
4.55%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. SONY's 178.74%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-29.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -2.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-56.50%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 74.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-385.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -239.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-86.25%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 28.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.67%
Buyback growth of 8.67% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.