PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
62.47%
Net income growth similar to SONY's 63.87%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-11.42%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONY at -29.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-15.56%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
14.08%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
96.53%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -302.25%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
122.98%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -129.50%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
96.43%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -324.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-106.09%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 152.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
552.32%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -239.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
54.49%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SONY's 124.35%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
53.27%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -100.23%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
24.13%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 5.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-7269.23%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-106.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -15.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
29.29%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -22.04%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
74.44%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 3979.21%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-1612.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -18.61%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
63.39%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -2371.82%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-99.49%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-18.70%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 74.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.