PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-49.41%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 20.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.07%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 18.95%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
13.47%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -1129.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.76%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-147.16%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 119.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
161.49%
AR growth well above SONY's 31.90%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
2696.43%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -77.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-1041.51%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 30.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-75.84%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 124.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
17.61%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -146.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-56.38%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 50076.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
12.06%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -29.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
81.63%
Acquisition growth of 81.63% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
22.30%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -19.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
49.81%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SONY's 6.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-76.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 115.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
165.94%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 4.67%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-251.24%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONY is 37.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
21300.00%
Issuance growth of 21300.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
10.30%
We have some buyback growth while SONY is negative at -293.33%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.