PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
68.51%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 164.38%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-9.77%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONY at -0.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
116.89%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
16.45%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
464.53%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -361.97%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
55.34%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -128.24%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
147.66%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -654.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
40.40%
Lower AP growth vs. SONY's 184.43%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
845.16%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -254.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-69.19%
Negative yoy while SONY is 199.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
132.50%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -24.33%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
13.03%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 22.58%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while SONY is negative at -4637.06%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-123.27%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 92.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
8.59%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -94.08%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
29.43%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -11.94%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-2028.86%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 53.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
80.84%
Debt repayment at 75-90% of SONY's 92.98%. Bill Ackman urges more debt clearance to match competitor’s lower leverage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-3.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -4769.68%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.