PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.58%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -80.58%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.14%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -8.93%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-211.57%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.56%
SBC growth of 1.56% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
98.51%
Well above SONY's 136.16% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-550.76%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 186.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
2818.75%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -182.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
456.95%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -127.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
159.40%
Growth well above SONY's 142.40%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
519.51%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -104.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
5.39%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -13.55%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-56.47%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 5.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-6750.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -209.74%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
17.65%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -8.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-36.93%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -358.92%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
3.24%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -301.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-128.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -171.64%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
6.90%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -36.42%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -31.46%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.