PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
44.77%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 225.11%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.78%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 14.11%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
27.52%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-3018.75%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -879.15%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
166.96%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -114.47%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-515.40%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -195.60%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-139.05%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 125.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-39.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -488.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-284.30%
Negative yoy while SONY is 416.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
40.94%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -201.17%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-15.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -4.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above SONY's 15.28%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
23.60%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -426.66%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-20.05%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 152.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
76.38%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -30.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-18.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -53.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
49.84%
Debt repayment above 1.5x SONY's 22.71%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.28%
Buyback growth below 50% of SONY's 66.41%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.