PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.46%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 18.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.62%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONY at -1.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.54%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
115.43%
Well above SONY's 29.83% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
24.47%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -181.75%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
58.99%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -66.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-141.79%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 3664.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 45.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-346.37%
Negative yoy while SONY is 650.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-16.01%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 110.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.00%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -14.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 84.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
49.10%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SONY's 27.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
24.82%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 166.45%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
260.48%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -3.03%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-60.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -73.38%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -206.72%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.