PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-221.76%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 11.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
33.33%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 22.92%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-936.36%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
720.51%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -19.64%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
3557.14%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -73.35%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
142.86%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 80.56%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-544.44%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -192.98%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-366.67%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 352.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
27.50%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. VUZI's 100.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-108.23%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -38.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
29.03%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -18.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-11.90%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
48.95%
Purchases growth of 48.95% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
28.31%
Liquidation growth of 28.31% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
85.00%
Growth well above VUZI's 6.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
273.21%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -13.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.43%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 124.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.