PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
120.77%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.25%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-8.33%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 22.92%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
116.30%
Deferred tax of 116.30% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-137.50%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -19.64%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-138.28%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -73.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-8.33%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 80.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
162.31%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -192.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-50.00%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 352.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
93.10%
Well above VUZI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-238.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -38.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
22.73%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -18.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
74.32%
Acquisition growth of 74.32% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-88.98%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
33.27%
Liquidation growth of 33.27% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-33.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while VUZI is 6.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-22.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -13.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
400.00%
Stock issuance far above VUZI's 124.06%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.