PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.81%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 80.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
17.49%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -30.19%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-70.55%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.02%
Less working capital growth vs. VUZI's 420.25%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-432.20%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 181.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
1755.00%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -50.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
661.84%
AP growth well above VUZI's 234.73%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-62.22%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -10.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.33%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 73.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-18.16%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 50.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.44%
Purchases growth of 16.44% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
9.69%
Liquidation growth of 9.69% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
200.00%
Growth well above VUZI's 116.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
64.96%
Investing outflow well above VUZI's 81.06%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
314.29%
Issuance growth of 314.29% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.