PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-42.73%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -8.68%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-16.15%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 93.22%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-5.78%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 198.05%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-2.78%
Negative yoy SBC while VUZI is 30.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-222.86%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 72.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-83.52%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -116.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
266.67%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -13.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-901.88%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 231.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
955.17%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -211.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
80.00%
Some yoy increase while VUZI is negative at -42.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-57.76%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
35.12%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -2.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
37.21%
Acquisition growth of 37.21% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
19.92%
Purchases growth of 19.92% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-13.70%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
86.05%
Growth well above VUZI's 14.93%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
33.20%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -2.05%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24500.00%
We slightly raise equity while VUZI is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
2.86%
Buyback growth of 2.86% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.