PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.62%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -25.80%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.87%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -97.54%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-112.05%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 1138.71%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-2.28%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -68.38%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
228.29%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -7.26%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-4852.94%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 191.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-166.89%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 139.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
6475.98%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -194.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
70.30%
Growth well above VUZI's 31.88%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 82.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
51.65%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -19.39%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-39.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 30.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-2416.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-12.17%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
5.11%
Liquidation growth of 5.11% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
268.80%
Growth well above VUZI's 6.26%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-65.48%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 30.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-190.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -775.41%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.72%
Buyback growth of 40.72% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.