PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
87.28%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 8.74%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
10.51%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 3.51%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-2906.74%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
10.39%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -32.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
35687.74%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -508.79%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1.75%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 84.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
125.39%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 58.01%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-15.02%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -203.81%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
373.56%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. VUZI's 898.74%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
54.17%
Some yoy increase while VUZI is negative at -34.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
80.72%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -47.95%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
29.75%
CapEx growth well above VUZI's 58.79%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-113.58%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-14.99%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.00%
Liquidation growth of 2.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
53.76%
Growth well above VUZI's 79.30%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-36.69%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 58.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-0.46%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 138.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-29.51%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.