PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.11%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with VUZI at -14.59%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.22%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 7.81%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
98.52%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. VUZI's 528.88%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
4.01%
Less SBC growth vs. VUZI's 78.48%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-105.64%
Negative yoy working capital usage while VUZI is 28.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
263.25%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -1187.10%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-846.77%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with VUZI at -135.27%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-295.25%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 144.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-130.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -133.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1172.73%
Both negative yoy, with VUZI at -80.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-46.52%
Negative yoy CFO while VUZI is 2.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-49.29%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 7.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
23.70%
Acquisition growth of 23.70% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
82.62%
Purchases growth of 82.62% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
29.59%
Liquidation growth of 29.59% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
702.33%
We have some outflow growth while VUZI is negative at -130.60%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
311.26%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -52.78%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.42%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.