PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.62%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -15.97%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.34%
Some D&A expansion while VUZI is negative at -8.82%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-53.91%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 99.29%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-0.44%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -0.02%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
142.53%
Well above VUZI's 90.19% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-3996.14%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with VUZI at -72.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
14.71%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VUZI's 68.65%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
1174.40%
AP growth well above VUZI's 242.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
112.63%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -602.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
86.87%
Well above VUZI's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
34.75%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.05%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
6.92%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -271.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-130.16%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-64.42%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-8.80%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
69.96%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. VUZI's 216.35%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-176.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -221.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34000.00%
Issuance growth of 34000.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
8.08%
Buyback growth of 8.08% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.