PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
41.35%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -14.30%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
23.28%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 6.83%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-89.79%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
15.91%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -3.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
117.69%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -377.54%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
156.51%
AR growth well above VUZI's 107.97%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-155.41%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with VUZI at -72.87%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-141.85%
Both negative yoy AP, with VUZI at -209.21%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-727.12%
Negative yoy usage while VUZI is 178.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-58.82%
Both negative yoy, with VUZI at -50.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
36.71%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -27.48%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-10.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 29.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
42.41%
Acquisition growth of 42.41% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
50.97%
Purchases growth of 50.97% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
6.73%
Liquidation growth of 6.73% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
74.77%
We have some outflow growth while VUZI is negative at -331.55%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
294.74%
Investing outflow well above VUZI's 18.55%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
53.96%
Buyback growth of 53.96% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.