PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
62.47%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 44.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-11.42%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-15.56%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
14.08%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -4.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
96.53%
Well above VUZI's 157.65% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
122.98%
AR growth well above VUZI's 210.81%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
96.43%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 102.68%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-106.09%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 11.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
552.32%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -140.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
54.49%
Growth of 54.49% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
53.27%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x VUZI's 2.43%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
24.13%
CapEx growth well above VUZI's 44.97%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-7269.23%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-106.75%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
29.29%
Liquidation growth of 29.29% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
74.44%
Growth well above VUZI's 82.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-1612.78%
We reduce yoy invests while VUZI stands at 63.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
63.39%
Debt repayment growth of 63.39% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-99.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-18.70%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.