PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.04%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -12.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.22%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with VUZI at -0.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
375.83%
Deferred tax of 375.83% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
0.06%
Less SBC growth vs. VUZI's 63.26%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
78.52%
Well above VUZI's 133.23% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-140.52%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 149.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-194.77%
Negative yoy inventory while VUZI is 47.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
121.99%
AP growth well above VUZI's 116.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
78.99%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. VUZI's 411.16%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
241.03%
Some yoy increase while VUZI is negative at -31.25%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
22.24%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of VUZI's 48.87%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
15.54%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -36.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-92.61%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-3.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-32.99%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
26.30%
Growth well above VUZI's 12.42%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-157.31%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -36.69%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
75.39%
Debt repayment growth of 75.39% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
14.44%
Buyback growth of 14.44% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.