PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.62%
Net income growth at 50-75% of VUZI's 24.57%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-1.82%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 13.11%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-147.66%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
1.53%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -26.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
1001.63%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -174.91%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
182.81%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -259.89%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
80.12%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -164.10%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
146.07%
Lower AP growth vs. VUZI's 694.64%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
1.41%
Some yoy usage while VUZI is negative at -62.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-101.82%
Negative yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
26.46%
Some CFO growth while VUZI is negative at -13.20%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-13.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while VUZI is 37.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
84.96%
Acquisition growth of 84.96% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
39.13%
Purchases growth of 39.13% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-4.88%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
62.08%
Growth well above VUZI's 3.37%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
207.09%
Investing outflow well above VUZI's 37.73%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-421.61%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.16%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.