229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.58%
Some net income increase while VUZI is negative at -13.53%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.14%
D&A growth well above VUZI's 4.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-211.57%
Negative yoy deferred tax while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.56%
SBC growth while VUZI is negative at -1.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
98.51%
Well above VUZI's 66.92% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-550.76%
AR is negative yoy while VUZI is 71.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
2818.75%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 253.43%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
456.95%
A yoy AP increase while VUZI is negative at -212.60%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
159.40%
Growth well above VUZI's 108.78%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
519.51%
Well above VUZI's 577.61%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
5.39%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 4.81%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-56.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -118.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-6750.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
17.65%
Purchases growth of 17.65% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-36.93%
We reduce yoy sales while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.24%
We have some outflow growth while VUZI is negative at -570.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-128.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with VUZI at -188.22%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
6.90%
Debt repayment growth of 6.90% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.72%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.