PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.46%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 11.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.62%
Negative yoy D&A while VUZI is 2.84%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with VUZI at -22.76%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
115.43%
Slight usage while VUZI is negative at -386.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
24.47%
AR growth while VUZI is negative at -704.17%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
58.99%
Some inventory rise while VUZI is negative at -220.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-141.79%
Negative yoy AP while VUZI is 485.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with VUZI at -214.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-346.37%
Both negative yoy, with VUZI at -1560.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-16.01%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with VUZI at -90.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
23.00%
Some CapEx rise while VUZI is negative at -44.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
49.10%
Liquidation growth of 49.10% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
24.82%
Growth of 24.82% while VUZI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
260.48%
We have mild expansions while VUZI is negative at -43.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-60.60%
We cut debt repayment yoy while VUZI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.61%
We cut yoy buybacks while VUZI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.