PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.47%
Some net income increase while WLDS is negative at -0.56%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-13.07%
Negative yoy D&A while WLDS is 95.65%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
Less SBC growth vs. WLDS's 21.10%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-909.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with WLDS at -2675.56%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-367.89%
AR is negative yoy while WLDS is 13.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
4427.27%
Some inventory rise while WLDS is negative at -16900.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
274.96%
Lower AP growth vs. WLDS's 777.27%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-811.11%
Both negative yoy, with WLDS at -20.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-18.13%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with WLDS at -26.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-3.34%
Both yoy lines negative, with WLDS at -8.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.32%
Purchases well above WLDS's 2.73%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
7.06%
Liquidation growth of 7.06% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-15.42%
We reduce yoy other investing while WLDS is 2.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
447.83%
Investing outflow well above WLDS's 2.23%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
73.43%
Debt repayment growth of 73.43% while WLDS is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while WLDS is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.