229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-269.83%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 2.97%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-3.18%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-258.66%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.72%
Working capital of 89.72% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.15%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-154.66%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-425.95%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-49.69%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.59%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-13.61%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-34.96%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-119.64%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.50%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
44.81%
Buyback growth of 44.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.