PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.19%
Net income growth of 4.19% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
1.13%
D&A growth of 1.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-252.82%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
6.89%
SBC growth of 6.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
57.02%
Working capital of 57.02% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-1311.03%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-186.72%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
300.14%
AP growth of 300.14% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-95.74%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.09%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-75.11%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
1.74%
Acquisition growth of 1.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
35.83%
Purchases growth of 35.83% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-12.09%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-447.83%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
87.94%
Investing flow of 87.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
41.86%
Debt repayment growth of 41.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
1360.00%
Issuance growth of 1360.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-32.53%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.