PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-25.87%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 5.50%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
1.98%
D&A growth of 1.98% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
39.93%
Deferred tax growth of 39.93% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
0.57%
SBC growth of 0.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
28.66%
Working capital of 28.66% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-86.76%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
164.71%
Inventory growth of 164.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
97.90%
AP growth of 97.90% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-651.21%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-43.94%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-8.34%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-11.77%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
88.89%
Acquisition growth of 88.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
29.50%
Purchases growth of 29.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-6.49%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-420.83%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
67.28%
Investing flow of 67.28% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-52.48%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.