PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-49.41%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-1.07%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
13.47%
Deferred tax growth of 13.47% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-0.76%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-147.16%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
161.49%
AR growth of 161.49% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
2696.43%
Inventory growth of 2696.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-1041.51%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-75.84%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
17.61%
Growth of 17.61% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-56.38%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
12.06%
CapEx growth of 12.06% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
81.63%
Acquisition growth of 81.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
22.30%
Purchases growth of 22.30% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
49.81%
Proceeds growth of 49.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-76.33%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
165.94%
Investing flow of 165.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-251.24%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
21300.00%
Issuance growth of 21300.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
10.30%
Buyback growth of 10.30% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.