PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.79%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 2.51%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-13.60%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
39.48%
Working capital of 39.48% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
43.04%
Slight AR growth while Technology median is negative at -17.05%. Peter Lynch would question if peers more aggressively collect or if this firm invests in growth.
199.07%
Inventory growth of 199.07% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-18.92%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
19.60%
Growth of 19.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
89.65%
A moderate rise while Technology median is negative at -24.18%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-19.99%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is -8.17%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-4.46%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.17%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-36.59%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
94.69%
Growth of 94.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-70.21%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
49.95%
Debt repayment growth of 49.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.71%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.