229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.51%
Revenue growth above 1.5x GPRO's 13.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
57.10%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x GPRO's 26.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
214.84%
EBIT growth above 1.5x GPRO's 69.10%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
214.84%
Operating income growth above 1.5x GPRO's 69.02%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
178.30%
Net income growth above 1.5x GPRO's 64.84%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
173.47%
EPS growth above 1.5x GPRO's 66.67%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
168.09%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x GPRO's 66.67%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.86%
Share count expansion well above GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.28%
Diluted share count expanding well above GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.94%
OCF growth at 50-75% of GPRO's 115.30%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
86.72%
FCF growth 75-90% of GPRO's 114.15%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
-24.03%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
21.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 6.97%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
126.03%
Positive 3Y CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
5.46%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
69.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of GPRO's 118.82%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
1543.25%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-3.27%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
31.60%
Below 50% of GPRO's 69.69%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
591.34%
Positive short-term CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
39.32%
Positive growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
7.09%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.01%
Positive short-term equity growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.76%
AR growth well above GPRO's 8.86%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
54.46%
We show growth while GPRO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
16.30%
Positive asset growth while GPRO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.89%
Positive BV/share change while GPRO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.82%
R&D dropping or stable vs. GPRO's 3.20%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
24.01%
We expand SG&A while GPRO cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
