229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.62%
Negative revenue growth while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-19.23%
Negative gross profit growth while GPRO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-24.77%
Negative EBIT growth while GPRO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-24.77%
Negative operating income growth while GPRO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-24.08%
Negative net income growth while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-22.73%
Negative EPS growth while GPRO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while GPRO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.32%
Share change of 0.32% while GPRO is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.23%
Diluted share change of 0.23% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.10%
Negative OCF growth while GPRO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-42.04%
Negative FCF growth while GPRO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1765.09%
10Y CAGR of 1765.09% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
499.14%
5Y CAGR of 499.14% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
300.86%
3Y CAGR of 300.86% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
21056.01%
OCF/share CAGR of 21056.01% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
668.52%
OCF/share CAGR of 668.52% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
328.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 328.30% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
20884.29%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 20884.29% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
898.35%
Net income/share CAGR of 898.35% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
585.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 585.11% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
1991.43%
Equity/share CAGR of 1991.43% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
671.56%
Equity/share CAGR of 671.56% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
311.89%
Equity/share CAGR of 311.89% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.73%
AR growth of 8.73% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
1.81%
Inventory growth of 1.81% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
7.93%
Asset growth of 7.93% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
8.67%
BV/share growth of 8.67% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.16%
R&D growth of 4.16% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
8.81%
SG&A growth of 8.81% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.
