Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.53%
Revenue growth under 50% of GPRO's 126.42%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
8.65%
Gross profit growth under 50% of GPRO's 144.93%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.59%
EBIT growth below 50% of GPRO's 1190.69%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.59%
Operating income growth under 50% of GPRO's 1190.69%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
9.28%
Net income growth under 50% of GPRO's 736.25%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
12.50%
EPS growth under 50% of GPRO's 700.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.37%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of GPRO's 730.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.31%
Share reduction while GPRO is at 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.32%
Reduced diluted shares while GPRO is at 1.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.02%
Dividend reduction while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
29.21%
Positive OCF growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
20.12%
FCF growth above 1.5x GPRO's 4.78%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
1522.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 50.52%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
352.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 50.52%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
63.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 50.52%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
2606.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 190.35%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
351.35%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 190.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
39.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of GPRO's 190.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
7128.17%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 849.32% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
438.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of GPRO's 849.32%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
40.00%
Below 50% of GPRO's 849.32%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
1888.57%
Below 50% of GPRO's 13788.94%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
273.49%
Below 50% of GPRO's 13788.94%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
59.44%
Below 50% of GPRO's 13788.94%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.85%
AR growth well above GPRO's 94.57%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
32.43%
Inventory growth well above GPRO's 30.78%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.19%
Asset growth well under 50% of GPRO's 55.79%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-6.54%
We have a declining book value while GPRO shows 81.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
13.71%
Debt growth of 13.71% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
5.18%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. GPRO's 8.73%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
10.81%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GPRO's 23.23%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
