229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
77.10%
Positive revenue growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
85.78%
Positive gross profit growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
117.16%
Positive EBIT growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
117.16%
Positive operating income growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
112.87%
Positive net income growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
113.89%
Positive EPS growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
120.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.53%
Share reduction while GPRO is at 4.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.51%
Reduced diluted shares while GPRO is at 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.55%
Dividend growth of 0.55% while GPRO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
154.51%
OCF growth above 1.5x GPRO's 53.43%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
224.08%
FCF growth above 1.5x GPRO's 58.41%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
1920.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 20.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
414.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 20.65%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
79.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 20.65%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
4013.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 80.44%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
531.41%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 80.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
114.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 80.44%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
5675.37%
Positive 10Y CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
477.56%
Positive 5Y CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
53.89%
Positive short-term CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1913.42%
Below 50% of GPRO's 22946.89%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
273.23%
Below 50% of GPRO's 22946.89%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
52.75%
Below 50% of GPRO's 22946.89%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.30%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
8.15%
Inventory growth well above GPRO's 7.20%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
12.96%
Asset growth above 1.5x GPRO's 1.41%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
12.28%
BV/share growth above 1.5x GPRO's 4.95%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
3.14%
Debt growth of 3.14% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
12.40%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. GPRO's 7.30%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
14.00%
SG&A growth well above GPRO's 9.49%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
