229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.79%
Revenue growth above 1.5x GPRO's 1.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
13.97%
Positive gross profit growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
21.84%
Positive EBIT growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
21.84%
Positive operating income growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
22.91%
Positive net income growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.81%
Positive EPS growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.81%
Positive diluted EPS growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.88%
Share reduction while GPRO is at 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.95%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.96%
Dividend reduction while GPRO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
80.54%
OCF growth above 1.5x GPRO's 2.64%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
84.66%
FCF growth above 1.5x GPRO's 8.28%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
901.22%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
86.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
43.84%
Positive 3Y CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
992.83%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 210.48%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
118.59%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of GPRO's 210.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
36.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x GPRO's 22.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1303.07%
Positive 10Y CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
66.20%
Positive 5Y CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
45.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while GPRO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
992.02%
Below 50% of GPRO's 6009.93%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
44.65%
Below 50% of GPRO's 6009.93%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
38.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while GPRO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.20%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 33.20% while GPRO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
57.62%
AR growth well above GPRO's 12.91%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
54.32%
We show growth while GPRO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
8.73%
Asset growth above 1.5x GPRO's 3.01%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.12%
Positive BV/share change while GPRO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
6.78%
Debt growth far above GPRO's 1.71%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
2.04%
We increase R&D while GPRO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
0.82%
SG&A declining or stable vs. GPRO's 26.99%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
