229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.16%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.33%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
82.98%
EBIT growth 75-90% of SONO's 100.61%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
82.98%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of SONO's 95.22%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
65.31%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SONO's 95.18%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
65.28%
EPS growth at 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
65.28%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SONO's 0.42%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.27%
Reduced diluted shares while SONO is at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.27%
Dividend growth of 0.27% while SONO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
273.49%
OCF growth above 1.5x SONO's 162.75%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
251.35%
FCF growth above 1.5x SONO's 150.11%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
282.07%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 17.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
98.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 25.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
43.72%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONO stands at 691.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.72%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.75%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.19%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 9.19% while SONO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
10.26%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONO's 133.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
2.84%
We show growth while SONO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.41%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 5.33%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
4.31%
1.25-1.5x SONO's 3.86%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
3.31%
We have some new debt while SONO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.55%
We cut SG&A while SONO invests at 2.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
