229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
75.37%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SONO's 32.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
58.07%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONO's 31.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
113.16%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 100.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
113.16%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 95.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
64.86%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SONO's 95.18%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
60.32%
EPS growth at 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
64.29%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
2.63%
Share count expansion well above SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.99%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.10%
OCF growth under 50% of SONO's 162.75%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
65.84%
FCF growth under 50% of SONO's 150.11%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
26.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 17.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-37.53%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SONO stands at 25.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-14.90%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
15.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONO's 292.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-37.83%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
213.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONO's 691.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
18.37%
Below 50% of SONO's 82.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-26.50%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SONO is 94.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
222.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
133.84%
Equity/share CAGR of 133.84% while SONO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
30.09%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONO's 38.98%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
75.77%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.98%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONO's 133.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-25.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
46.99%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONO's 5.33%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
38.56%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONO's 3.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.76%
We increase R&D while SONO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
35.74%
SG&A growth well above SONO's 2.76%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
