229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.68%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of SONO's 32.73%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
13.42%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
77.78%
EBIT growth 75-90% of SONO's 100.61%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
77.78%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of SONO's 95.22%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
73.77%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SONO's 95.18%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
68.97%
EPS growth at 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
67.86%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
2.27%
Share count expansion well above SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.35%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.95%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SONO's 162.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
121.97%
FCF growth 75-90% of SONO's 150.11%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
-40.93%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONO stands at 17.65%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
43.93%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 25.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
48.24%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
14.70%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONO's 292.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
66.28%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
47.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONO's 691.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-42.06%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SONO is at 82.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-21.86%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SONO is 94.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
46.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
33.49%
Equity/share CAGR of 33.49% while SONO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
33.81%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONO's 38.98%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
18.44%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.05%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONO's 133.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
40.28%
We show growth while SONO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
11.45%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONO's 5.33%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.14%
75-90% of SONO's 3.86%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.40%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
7.06%
SG&A growth well above SONO's 2.76%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
