229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.51%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 32.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
57.10%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONO's 31.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
214.84%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SONO's 100.61%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
214.84%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SONO's 95.22%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
178.30%
Net income growth above 1.5x SONO's 95.18%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
173.47%
EPS growth above 1.5x SONO's 94.83%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
168.09%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SONO's 94.83%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.86%
Share count expansion well above SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.28%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.94%
OCF growth under 50% of SONO's 162.75%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
86.72%
FCF growth 50-75% of SONO's 150.11%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
-24.03%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONO stands at 17.65%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
21.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONO's 25.72%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
126.03%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
5.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONO's 292.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
69.62%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1543.25%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 691.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-3.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SONO is at 82.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
31.60%
Below 50% of SONO's 94.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
591.34%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
39.32%
Equity/share CAGR of 39.32% while SONO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
7.09%
Below 50% of SONO's 38.98%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
30.01%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.76%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONO's 133.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
54.46%
We show growth while SONO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
16.30%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONO's 5.33%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
10.89%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONO's 3.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.82%
We increase R&D while SONO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
24.01%
SG&A growth well above SONO's 2.76%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
