229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
58.90%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SONO's 32.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
77.39%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONO's 31.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
115.46%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 100.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
115.46%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 95.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
102.88%
Net income growth comparable to SONO's 95.18%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
96.37%
EPS growth similar to SONO's 94.83%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
100.00%
Similar diluted EPS growth to SONO's 94.83%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.61%
Share count expansion well above SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.59%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.88%
OCF growth at 50-75% of SONO's 162.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
104.70%
FCF growth 50-75% of SONO's 150.11%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
377.20%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 17.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
292.42%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 25.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
109.24%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1004.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 292.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
551.40%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
202.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONO's 691.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1215.98%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 82.31% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
899.96%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 94.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
219.38%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
477.70%
Equity/share CAGR of 477.70% while SONO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
439.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 38.98%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
202.40%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONO shows 133.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
26.59%
We show growth while SONO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
13.53%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONO's 5.33%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
12.36%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONO's 3.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.17%
We increase R&D while SONO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
21.17%
SG&A growth well above SONO's 2.76%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
