229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
63.89%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SONO's 32.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
81.92%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SONO's 31.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
99.08%
EBIT growth similar to SONO's 100.61%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
99.08%
Operating income growth similar to SONO's 95.22%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
97.25%
Net income growth comparable to SONO's 95.18%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
100.00%
EPS growth similar to SONO's 94.83%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
100.00%
Similar diluted EPS growth to SONO's 94.83%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.30%
Share count expansion well above SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.32%
OCF growth under 50% of SONO's 162.75%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
175.26%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 150.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
2443.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 17.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
499.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 25.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
335.21%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
31443.02%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 292.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
791.95%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
325.70%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONO's 691.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
25845.92%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 82.31% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1098.68%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 94.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
677.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1613.67%
Equity/share CAGR of 1613.67% while SONO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
638.86%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 38.98%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
275.40%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
207.02%
AR growth well above SONO's 133.00%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
59.28%
We show growth while SONO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
19.17%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONO's 5.33%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
17.19%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONO's 3.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.52%
We increase R&D while SONO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
28.64%
SG&A growth well above SONO's 2.76%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
