229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.57%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SONO's 32.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
46.24%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 31.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
57.26%
EBIT growth 50-75% of SONO's 100.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
57.26%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of SONO's 95.22%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
59.04%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SONO's 95.18%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
61.29%
EPS growth at 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
58.06%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.06%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SONO's 0.42%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.10%
Reduced diluted shares while SONO is at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.41%
Similar OCF growth to SONO's 162.75%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
272.16%
FCF growth above 1.5x SONO's 150.11%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
2732.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 17.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
429.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 25.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
234.49%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
16188.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 292.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
684.10%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
289.96%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONO's 691.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
166808.11%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 82.31% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
671.64%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 94.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
272.57%
Positive short-term CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2266.34%
Equity/share CAGR of 2266.34% while SONO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
606.94%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 38.98%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
242.62%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONO is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.11%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SONO's 133.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
83.94%
We show growth while SONO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
11.37%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONO's 5.33%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
7.66%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SONO's 3.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.48%
We increase R&D while SONO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
11.33%
SG&A growth well above SONO's 2.76%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
