229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.04%
Revenue growth under 50% of SONO's 81.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
33.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONO's 67.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
44.84%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONO's 33989.05%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
44.84%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONO's 33989.05%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
41.35%
Net income growth under 50% of SONO's 3685.29%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
41.89%
EPS growth under 50% of SONO's 3642.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
43.84%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONO's 3242.86%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.37%
Share reduction while SONO is at 1.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.53%
Reduced diluted shares while SONO is at 13.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
2.48%
Dividend growth of 2.48% while SONO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
36.71%
OCF growth under 50% of SONO's 522.89%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
41.58%
FCF growth under 50% of SONO's 1648.25%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
989.83%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
93.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.43%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
790.73%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while SONO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
55.93%
Positive OCF/share growth while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
14.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1534.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 76.70% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
102.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONO's 76.70%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
27.63%
Below 50% of SONO's 76.70%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
576.32%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONO's 223.22%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
20.40%
Below 50% of SONO's 223.22%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
7.89%
Below 50% of SONO's 223.22%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.67%
Dividend/share CAGR of 70.67% while SONO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
41.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 41.06% while SONO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-24.52%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONO shows 66.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
26.09%
We show growth while SONO is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.19%
Asset growth well under 50% of SONO's 8.22%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
11.56%
Under 50% of SONO's 32.03%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.22%
Debt growth far above SONO's 0.05%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
4.05%
We increase R&D while SONO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
13.45%
SG&A growth well above SONO's 14.71%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
