229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.39%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.56%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 22.36%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-4.69%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 63.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.69%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 63.05%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-5.43%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 46.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.85%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 47.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-4.85%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 47.11%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.61%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.72%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
5.62%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while SONY cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
16.35%
OCF growth under 50% of SONY's 688.01%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
16.88%
FCF growth under 50% of SONY's 262.33%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
191.54%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 37.59%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
82.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 39.43%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22.94%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to SONY's 25.20%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
185.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 1667.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
98.24%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 83.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
32.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SONY's 541.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
237.55%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 353.93%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
141.05%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 83.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
30.72%
Below 50% of SONY's 62.16%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-19.44%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SONY stands at 203.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
5.42%
Below 50% of SONY's 101.13%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
22.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 11.26%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
98.73%
Below 50% of SONY's 980.52%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
24.90%
Below 50% of SONY's 1092.30%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
12.27%
Below 50% of SONY's 63.89%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-5.95%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.49%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 2.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.08%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.84%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
3.58%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
3.70%
R&D growth of 3.70% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-1.16%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
