229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.16%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
4.33%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SONY's 15.43%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
82.98%
EBIT growth below 50% of SONY's 347.30%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
82.98%
Operating income growth under 50% of SONY's 347.30%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
65.31%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 168.08%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
65.28%
EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 167.88%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
65.28%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SONY's 171.26%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SONY's 0.30%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-0.27%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.27%
Dividend growth of 0.27% while SONY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
273.49%
OCF growth of 273.49% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
251.35%
FCF growth of 251.35% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
282.07%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 134.89%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
98.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 84.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
43.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 26.44%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.72%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 38.72% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.75%
Equity/share CAGR of 60.75% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.19%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 9.19% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
10.26%
AR growth well above SONY's 1.45%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
2.84%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 2.45%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.41%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.31%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
3.31%
Debt growth far above SONY's 1.80%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.55%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
