229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.32%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 12.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.69%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 1.23%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-29.78%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-29.78%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-31.26%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-31.09%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-31.09%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.51%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.51%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-5.08%
Dividend reduction while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-167.01%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-393.58%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
401.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 339.66%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
135.13%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to SONY's 143.74%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
54.15%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SONY's 85.97%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-118.30%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.54%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 38.40%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.77%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 4.77% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
7.26%
AR growth well above SONY's 0.01%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
46.97%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.55%
Negative asset growth while SONY invests at 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.66%
Under 50% of SONY's 23.51%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-68.57%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
3.79%
SG&A declining or stable vs. SONY's 7.62%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
