229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.67%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 6.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-19.27%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 13.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-281.37%
Negative EBIT growth while SONY is at 313.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-281.37%
Negative operating income growth while SONY is at 313.33%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-269.79%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 800.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-276.83%
Negative EPS growth while SONY is at 602.08%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-270.73%
Negative diluted EPS growth while SONY is at 602.08%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-4.04%
Share reduction while SONY is at 28.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.08%
Reduced diluted shares while SONY is at 28.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
8.10%
Dividend growth of 8.10% while SONY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-425.95%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-245.82%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
357.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 113.97%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
111.63%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of SONY's 144.25%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
47.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 17.73%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-199.29%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-269.58%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.67%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 4.31%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.36%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 12.36% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-1.58%
Firm’s AR is declining while SONY shows 3.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
41.28%
We show growth while SONY is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.66%
Positive asset growth while SONY is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-7.90%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
414.52%
We have some new debt while SONY reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.25%
SG&A growth well above SONY's 2.48%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
