229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.87%
Negative revenue growth while SONY stands at 14.70%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.71%
Negative gross profit growth while SONY is at 2.51%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-45.91%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-45.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-57.50%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-58.06%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-58.06%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.70%
Share count expansion well above SONY's 0.60%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.64%
Diluted share count expanding well above SONY's 0.60%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-1.67%
Dividend reduction while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-104.59%
Negative OCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-126.68%
Negative FCF growth while SONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
435.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 249.58%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
78.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SONY's 55.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
32.67%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SONY's 4.34%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 4.15% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.77%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.63%
Positive short-term equity growth while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.33% while SONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
7.63%
AR growth well above SONY's 13.13%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-3.89%
Inventory is declining while SONY stands at 2.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.83%
Asset growth above 1.5x SONY's 2.99%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.00%
Positive BV/share change while SONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
5.76%
Debt growth far above SONY's 1.91%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-12.20%
Our R&D shrinks while SONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-11.93%
We cut SG&A while SONY invests at 9.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
